Maturity Mismatch: The Quiet Problem That Stalls Profitable Companies
When we look at a company's balance sheet, the first thing we check is not profitability but the distance between the life of the assets and the maturity of the debt. When that distance opens up, even the most profitable business is left trailing its own growth.
The problem is not profitability
A significant share of the companies that come to us are profitable. The income statement is healthy, the operating margin is normal for the sector, the order book is full. Yet cash tightens at each month end, the payment calendar is constantly rebuilt, and conversations with banks become urgent rather than strategic.
Behind this picture there is almost always the same structure: an investment with a seven-year payback has been funded with debt that turns over in eighteen months.
How the mismatch forms
The process is usually innocent. The company makes a capacity investment; because long-term financing takes time to arrange, it starts with a working capital facility and says it will convert later. The investment is completed; the conversion never happens. Within the same year a second requirement arises and is also solved short term.
Two or three years later the balance sheet consists of long-lived assets and short-term debt. The company has to roll the same debt every year, and that rollover — independently of the interest rate — hands negotiating power to the other side again and again.
The symptoms
The early symptoms are clear: the share of short-term debt in total debt rising year on year; the number of banks increasing while the limit at each one shrinks; letters of guarantee and mortgages leaving no unencumbered security; investment decisions being taken according to the cash position rather than the financing calendar.
None of these appear in the income statement. That is why the problem is usually noticed late.
The answer is a structure, not a loan
The first thing to do in this situation is not to find a new loan. It is to build the debt and security inventory, and then to calculate the company's real debt service capability. In most cases the total amount of existing debt is bearable; the problem lies not in the amount but in the distribution of maturities.
The right arrangement usually has three steps: moving part of the short-term debt into a long-term structure with a grace period, simplifying the security package to create unencumbered collateral, and where necessary introducing equity or a hybrid instrument.
The output of this work is not merely a relieved cash flow. A balance sheet that has become legible to banks also makes the next rounds of financing easier.
NART Insights
Quality of Earnings: The Gap Between Reported and Real Profit
In an acquisition the price is set not by the profit in the income statement but by normalised earnings. Where does the difference come from?
Learn moreFour Traits Shared by Projects Rejected at Credit Committee
When technically sound projects fail to find financing, the reason is usually not the project itself but the construction of the file.
Learn moreThe Final Twelve Months Before Selling Your Company
Most of the decisions that determine value in a sale process are taken a year before the process begins. What to do in that period.
Learn moreStart a mandate discussion
Tell us about your capital requirement, your transaction idea or your structuring problem. The first assessment meeting is free of charge and strictly confidential.